Archive for January, 2009



Why the Yogi gets Web Presence Management? »


| by Bala Gopalan on January 31st, 2009 | No Comments »

I wish I had an answer to that because I’m tired of answering that question.

The last several years have seen an explosion in the space of point marketing solutions. A space that will define your web presence and include among others solutions for web content management, sites and landing pages management, online communities, webcasts, podcasts, support forums, idea forums, blogs, wikis, polls and surveys, e-mail marketing management, website analytics, lead nurturing, customer relationship management, and search marketing management. There is a plethora of vendor solutions available in each one of these categories.

Oh, Great! So it is a marketer’s perfect world then?

If the world was perfect, it wouldn’t be.

Well, not exactly! What not exactly? Does this sound all too familar? You send out e-mails using vendor A to the list from your desktop Excelsheet that leads to registrations on vendor B for webcasts to be delivered by vendor C and to be archived by vendor D to be posted on the community platform of vendor E activity on which you would like to be progressively sent to your CRM system on vendor F. Somewhere in this mix is your own .com site, with or without a login, and analytics from vendor G. And, that all important copy change that you wanted to make on your site is request #42 for your webmaster/IT, who is working on scripts for your data to flow from vendor A to vendor C (or was it vendor F) so that you can have a more qualified lead for your Sales team. Working across these vendors and your own IT you pray that one more window of opportunity does not close on you ..

Now, you have’nt had enough and want to reach out to your audience with a new podcast or an eBook. What do you do? OK, you send out e-mails using vendor A to the list from your desktop Excelsheet that leads to registrations on vendor B for podcasts to be delivered by vendor C … wait a second!

It’s like deja-vu, all over again.

and, more. Audience Joe has as many profiles and metrics as there are vendors and campaigns. Lucky you, get to consolidate them the fun way on that spreadsheet again or the not so fun way by opening an IT project and wait until .. wait, ..

It gets late early out there.

So you wish there was that one single interface – your own pilot’s dashboard – from where you can control all the aspects of your marketing plane with the best-in-class components for the different functionality and importantly, fly the plane yourself too. Despair not. We are with you there ..

You can observe a lot by just watching.

And, so we did (by watching and participating). Embark on this mission to provide complete web presence management across multiple channels without the multiple vendor overhead, progressive and consolidated 360° optics into target audiences, and tighter integration with sales. Our first product release is cooking in the clouds (force.com platform) for a Jan’09 release. But wait ..

It ain’t over till it’s over.

We have larger and grander plans to make your life easier. We’ll simplify the process on how you can manage your brand’s presence not just on your corporate .com sites but also on the increasing list of social sites where they talk about you, with or without you. So wouldn’t it be great to let us support you in joining these conversations for ..

The future ain’t what it used to be.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post



From barackobama.com to whitehouse.gov »


| by Shyam Subramanyan on January 21st, 2009 | 1 Comment »

I was registered on Obama’s site for more than a year leading up to the elections.  I was impressed with how his campaign managed his web presence across various channels.  I was also registered at johnmccain.com and hillaryclinton.com so I could follow all the lead characters in the race closely.

Thinking back, as an audience, there were two things that Obama’s campaign did much better than the other campaigns.   First, the consistency in which they kept in touch with their audience.  As audience, there’s something comforting about knowing how often and familiarity with the tone of communication you receive from an organization.  The consistency creates a rhythm for the organization, but more importantly it creates a rhythm for the audience as well.  There were no periods of lull or sudden frenzy that was apparent in the other campaigns.  Second, the complete orchestration of the content of the email campaigns, website, and content distributed through social media outlets.   If you click through or visit the website following an email communication, the media elements on barackobama.com kept you focused on that specific message.  With other campaigns, it was very clear that different arms of the campaign were working different channels and I was left with more questions than answers with the two minutes I was ready to spend with them.

Now there’s a new whitehouse.gov website that promises to extend what I experienced with barackobama.com. You can sign up here like I did.

Will the ingenuity of barackobama.com translate to whitehouse.gov?  Will change really come to Washington? Based on what I saw on barackobama.com, there’s much to be hopeful!

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post